Skip to main content

Arab Cities As Learning Cities: Towards membership in the Global Network of Learning Cities


2017-07-27_23-55-10Modern cities in the 21st century are defined by “individual empowerment”, “social inclusion”, “economic development”. “cultural prosperity”, and “sustainable development”. The rapid urbanization around the world (see here), makes it imperative for cities, as they grow in population, to meet the societal, economic, and cultural needs of its citizens who are growing increasingly diverse. But  you do not have to scrutinize the Arab cities’ ecologies to know that they are conceptually and pragmatically nothing near a modern city as illustrated above. A typical Arab city, let’s say my city Tripoli in northern Lebanon, is underdeveloped, lacks social mobility, individuals are undervalued, has marginalized groups, and the city development is temporal. The marginalization or assimilation of groups in the city is only growing by the day. I have seen this in every Arab city I have visited, with the exception of a few in the GCC.

A key ingredient for continuous development is life-long learning. Life-long learning is not a new concept in history dating back to thousands of years and particularly and perpetually emphasized in the Holy Quran and by Prophet Mohammad (SAW). Although there are some initiatives in some Arab cities to help citizens access learning in informal and non-formal settings, these initiatives are marred by lack of quality, rigor, and ubiquity.  Arab cities need  tohave a paradigm shift towards life-long learning. They need to become learning cities. Fortunately, there is a global network for learning cities that can really assist them towards sustainable development.


The UNESCO Global Network for Learning Cities (GNLC) consists of cities that learn and that share their learning with other cities in the network.  It is an international policy-oriented network for inspiration, know-how and best practice. GNLC operates under the premise that although every city is unique, when it comes to learning, cities share certain characteristics. Therefore, learning cities at all levels of development can take great advantage by sharing ideas with other cities, as solutions for issues that arise as one learning city develops may already exist in other cities. The UNESCO GNLC supports and improves the practice of lifelong learning in the world’s cities by promoting policy dialog and peer learning among ember cities; forging link; fostering partnerships; providing capacity development; and developing instruments to encourage and recognize progress made in building learning cities.



Benefits of Being a Member City in GNLC

When a city joins the UNESCO GNLC, it enjoys the following benefits


Receive guidance and support

• Access tools and strategies for developing learning cities.

• Keep up to date on learning city developments.


Be part of a dynamic network

• Exchange information with other learning cities.

• Communicate with a network of experts and professionals.

• Build partnerships.

• Host conferences and meetings.


Enjoy recognition for your efforts

• Share your milestones and inspire other cities.

• Showcase your city.

• Apply for the UNESCO Learning City Award.


12 Key Features of a Learning City



learning cities global network key features


The Pediment – three areas of focus reflect the wider benefits of building a modern learning city,

broadly defined as:


(1) Individual empowerment and social cohesion;

(2) Economic development and cultural prosperity;

and

(3) Sustainable development.


The Columns – six areas of focus reflect the major building blocks of a learning city:


(1) Inclusive learning in the education system;

(2) Revitalized learning in families and

communities;

(3) Effective learning for and in the workplace;

(4) Extended use of modern learning technologies;

(5) Enhanced quality in learning; and

(6) A vibrant culture of learning throughout life.


The Foundational Steps – three areas of focus reflect the fundamental conditions for building a

learning city:


(1) Strong political will and commitment;

(2) Governance and participation of all

stakeholders; and

(3) Mobilization and utilization of resources



The Key Features can serve as a comprehensive checklist of action points to help municipal governments and other stakeholders of cities in their efforts to build learning cities that promote lifelong learning for all.


Furthermore, as the members of a global network of learning cities need to be recommended by UNESCO. Member States, the national authorities of the Member States can use the Key Features to select and recommend cities to join the network.


Currently, there are 188 member cities from 42 countries. Only 16 are from the MENA region: Algeria (9 cities), Egypt (1 city), Jordan (5 cities), Tunisia (1 city) (See Map below).

2017-07-27_23-34-13

Click the image above to view the full map.


How to Become a Member

If a city wishes to become a member, there are few steps to be taken. The city needs to also know that UNESCO will be monitoring the city to meet the key features stated above.


The city government can apply by following these steps:

Step 1: Commit to developing a learning city.
Step 2: Adopt the Guiding Documents of the UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities.
Step 3: Complete the application form.
Step 4: Ensure the application form is signed and stamped by the mayor.
Step 5: Email the application form to country’s National Commission for UNESCO for endorsement, making sure to cc the Secretariat of the UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities (learningcities(at)unesco.org).

For more details about membership and the application process, please consult the membership concept.

See more on how to become a member.


My hope is that city mayors and executives take this opportunity to help empower individual citizens for sustainable development because learning never stops, and learning is only optimized via connectedness.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

198 METHODS of Nonviolent Actions to Instill Change

In 1972, Gene Sharp produced  a brochure listing 198 methods on nonviolent actions to instill change. Since then, his methods have become a blueprint for nonviolent actions around the world. I publishing it here in the hope that this might spark done ideas for change. Practitioners of nonviolent struggle have an entire arsenal of “nonviolent weapons” at their disposal. Listed below are 198 of them, classified into three broad categories: nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation (social, economic, and political), and nonviolent intervention. A description and historical examples of each can be found in volume two of The Politics of Nonviolent Action, by Gene Sharp. THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION Formal Statements                     1. Public Speeches                     2. Letters of opposition or support                     3. Declarations by organizations and institutions                     4. Signed public statements                     5. Declara
Post a Comment
Read more

Hattie’s Effect Size: A pseudoscience or critics just being critics?

Hattie’s meta-mata analysis that culminated in the publication of his most influential work of Visible Learning (2009), and later updated to include more studies, has been hailed as the “holy grail” for educators and education leaders around the world. In particular, his effect size of instructional practice interventions has had the lion’s share of his work. Hattie considered that if schools set the effect size at 0 then “virtually everything works, and so we need to shift the question from “ what works in education” to “what works best in education”. Hattie’s meta-meta analysis of more than 800  meta-analyses studies comprising 50,000 studies (later included more 1500 meta-analyses) revealed that the baseline of the effect size that schools should start from is not 0 but 0.4, termed as the “hinge point”. In other words, for medium to large effect sizes on student achievement, the effect size of an instructional practice should be o.4 and above. This does not mean that we need
Post a Comment
Read more

Here's What School Accreditation Agencies Are Getting Wrong about Technology Integration

From Jeff Peterson on the Common s "The Rise of Private International Schools" has been the hype phrase in the education "Galaxy" in recent years. Certainly, parents and their kids are opting more for international schools, with the hope that they receive a world class education (if they can afford the tuition fees anyway). However, to ensure these international schools offer what they claim, they are periodically reviewed by accreditation agencies. Typically, a school has to undergo the accreditation process starting with a self study and ending with the official accreditation evaluation team. Eventually, the team submits an exit report after their visit (which typically lasts few days) whether the school is accredited of not. But there’s on more add-on to the accreditation process that has gradually been in place for the past decade. The school accreditation agencies now, more than ever, focus on technology integration in schools, as they believe that s
Post a Comment
Read more